Southeastern Conference
Power 4Women's Basketball · 16 teams · 193 scored athletes
Last updated: July 30, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams
South Carolina Gamecocks
12 scored players
68.8
Avg
LSU Tigers
13 scored players
66.4
Avg
Oklahoma Sooners
10 scored players
66.1
Avg
Kentucky Wildcats
10 scored players
65.5
Avg
Texas Longhorns
13 scored players
64.0
Avg
Vanderbilt Commodores
13 scored players
62.8
Avg
Ole Miss Rebels
12 scored players
59.4
Avg
Mississippi State Bulldogs
11 scored players
58.9
Avg
Tennessee Lady Volunteers
13 scored players
57.7
Avg
Missouri Tigers
12 scored players
57.2
Avg
Georgia Lady Bulldogs
11 scored players
56.5
Avg
Florida Gators
12 scored players
55.7
Avg
Alabama Crimson Tide
15 scored players
54.3
Avg
Texas A&M Aggies
12 scored players
51.3
Avg
Arkansas Razorbacks
12 scored players
51.1
Avg
Auburn Tigers
12 scored players
48.8
Avg
Top Athletes
Mikayla Blakes
G · Vanderbilt Commodores
Joyce Edwards
F · South Carolina Gamecocks
Madison Booker
F · Texas Longhorns
MiLaysia Fulwiley
G · LSU Tigers
Liv McGill
G · Florida Gators
Clara Strack
C · Kentucky Wildcats
Ny'Ceara Pryor
G · Texas A&M Aggies
Tonie Morgan
G · Kentucky Wildcats
Rori Harmon
G · Texas Longhorns
Mikaylah Williams
G · LSU Tigers
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and risk assessment into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Risk Assessment rewards durable availability over a full sample (a higher score means lower risk). We update scores after every Sunday's full sync.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →